We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
# name_to_handle_at02 tst_test.c:1684: TINFO: LTP version: 20230516 tst_test.c:1568: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 00m 30s name_to_handle_at02.c:75: TPASS: invalid-dfd: name_to_handle_at() failed as expected: EBADF (9) name_to_handle_at02.c:75: TPASS: not a directory: name_to_handle_at() failed as expected: ENOTDIR (20) name_to_handle_at02.c:75: TPASS: invalid-path: name_to_handle_at() failed as expected: EFAULT (14) name_to_handle_at02.c:69: TFAIL: invalid-file-handle: name_to_handle_at() should fail with EFAULT: EOPNOTSUPP (95) name_to_handle_at02.c:69: TFAIL: zero-file-handle-size: name_to_handle_at() should fail with EOVERFLOW: EOPNOTSUPP (95) name_to_handle_at02.c:69: TFAIL: high-file-handle-size: name_to_handle_at() should fail with EINVAL: EOPNOTSUPP (95) name_to_handle_at02.c:69: TFAIL: invalid-mount_id: name_to_handle_at() should fail with EFAULT: EOPNOTSUPP (95) name_to_handle_at02.c:75: TPASS: invalid-flags: name_to_handle_at() failed as expected: EINVAL (22) name_to_handle_at02.c:75: TPASS: empty-path: name_to_handle_at() failed as expected: ENOENT (2)
Musl just wraps this syscall, so it is due to checks inside the kernel.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Musl just wraps this syscall, so it is due to checks inside the kernel.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: