You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that the results I was getting didn't match the official AWS calculator (http://calculator.s3.amazonaws.com/), and it seems to come down to the retrieval rates.
It seems like e754741 updated them to the wrong values. The examples I see in the Amazon Glacier FAQ all use $0.01/GB. Try as I might, I couldn't seem to find the per-region prices for Glacier retrieval.
If I take this calculator's results and adjust them for the $0.01/GB retrieval rate (in us-east-1), my results line up with the official AWS calculator and with the rudimentary calculation shown by the Glacier "Data Retrieval Policy" screen in the AWS Management Console.
@karpach Are you sure that the retrieval rates in your PR are current?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@karpach As an example, in your commit (e754741), you changed the retrieval pricing in regionRetrievalRate() for us-west-2 from $0.011 to 0.055. Based on your screenshot, that value should have remained unchanged.
Hi, thanks for maintaining this calculator!
I noticed that the results I was getting didn't match the official AWS calculator (http://calculator.s3.amazonaws.com/), and it seems to come down to the retrieval rates.
It seems like e754741 updated them to the wrong values. The examples I see in the Amazon Glacier FAQ all use $0.01/GB. Try as I might, I couldn't seem to find the per-region prices for Glacier retrieval.
If I take this calculator's results and adjust them for the $0.01/GB retrieval rate (in
us-east-1
), my results line up with the official AWS calculator and with the rudimentary calculation shown by the Glacier "Data Retrieval Policy" screen in the AWS Management Console.@karpach Are you sure that the retrieval rates in your PR are current?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: