Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LessPass Database: idea to let it stay #759

Open
r0ckyjoe opened this issue Feb 6, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

LessPass Database: idea to let it stay #759

r0ckyjoe opened this issue Feb 6, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@r0ckyjoe
Copy link

r0ckyjoe commented Feb 6, 2023

Hello @guillaumevincent,
I've read your post about the decision to shut-down LessPass Database. It makes a lot of sense.

Only thing if I may, I just wondering if instead of closing it out, it might make sense letting it live in self-hosted setup, and there add functionalities like the full encryption of the metadata. This way there won't be costs to maintain the Public LessPass Database as it will be on each and every user that decides to go for such a setup but it will still survive and evolve.

With self-hosted mode there are ways like Clouflare tunnels with access policies, or Authelia to add an extra layer of security and grant access only to those who are supposed to use it. It will be really a shame to see it disappearing..

I am not in the position of actively contributing to the development of the project but I can help out with testing and funding.

Hope you would like to consider this option and maybe also others would like to see a similar evolution.

Thanks,
RJ

@edouard-lopez
Copy link
Member

This message answer some of your questions

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants