We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Can we extend hidden classes, this way our CSS file is optimized even further? The best visual example I can give you is the following....
.processor() { width:100px; height:50px; } .ps3 { &:extend(.processor) } .xbox { &:extend(.processor) }
There is really no need for me to add .processor {} as a CSS selector to my rule set in the compiled output. I simply want the following results...
.ps3, .xbox { width:100px; height:50px; }
Thanks for any creative ideas
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
See #1177. But currently - no, we can't. There's a hackish workaround though: move the .processor thing to a separate file imported with (reference).
.processor
(reference)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Closing as duplicate of #1177.
No branches or pull requests
Can we extend hidden classes, this way our CSS file is optimized even further? The best visual example I can give you is the following....
There is really no need for me to add .processor {} as a CSS selector to my rule set in the compiled output. I simply want the following results...
Thanks for any creative ideas
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: