You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This could become an issue since we use the command \ISBNhardcover[]{} since commit langsci/langscibook@48e29e5 in order to accommodate EAN+2 ISBN addons.
zenodo.py does not recognise ISBNs from \ISBNhardcover[]{} and results in an error.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For Zenodo, the main functionality is to point to the digital ISBN, since this is, well, digital.
The hardcover ISBN is also related, true, but I cannot see any practical use for that.
The fact that we fail to retrieve and hence fail to link the hardcover ISBN will probably have zero consequences.
When these are used in a localmetadata.tex to configure the ISBNs of the book, registerzenodo.py does not work, because it seems to be looking for \renewcommand{\lsISBNhardcover}, which is a different way of inputting the ISBN. The error message is this:
The issue is that sometimes you want to input the ISBN via the user-level command \ISBNhardcover instead of going through \renewcommand{\lsISBNhardcover}. One example where this happens is when you want to functionalities of \ISBNhardcover such as giving the EAN+2 as optional arguments.
So it would be good if registerzenodo.py could scan for either the user-level command or the \renewcommand way of providing ISBNs.
zenodo.py
seems to depend on this format:This could become an issue since we use the command
\ISBNhardcover[]{}
since commit langsci/langscibook@48e29e5 in order to accommodate EAN+2 ISBN addons.zenodo.py
does not recognise ISBNs from\ISBNhardcover[]{}
and results in an error.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: