Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parent not found in tree error #851

Open
MegaRedHand opened this issue Mar 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Parent not found in tree error #851

MegaRedHand opened this issue Mar 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working P1 This is a MUST for this milestone. It's a main feature, or blocking other main features.

Comments

@MegaRedHand
Copy link
Collaborator

MegaRedHand commented Mar 7, 2024

After running for some time on Gnosis chain, the node failed to compute the new head with the error:

Task #PID<0.1913.0> started from LambdaEthereumConsensus.ForkChoice terminating
** (RuntimeError) Parent 585E3E2FC11948F70E2EF604BB7948837644E9A8DB4223739DA63B003CF47F23 not found in tree
    (lambda_ethereum_consensus 0.1.0) lib/lambda_ethereum_consensus/fork_choice/simple_tree.ex:84: LambdaEthereumConsensus.ForkChoice.Simple.Tree.get_children   (lambda_ethereum_consensus 0.1.0) lib/types/store.ex:124: Types.Store.get_children/2
    (lambda_ethereum_consensus 0.1.0) lib/lambda_ethereum_consensus/fork_choice/helpers.ex:112: LambdaEthereumConsensus.ForkChoice.Helpers.filter_block_tree/4
    (lambda_ethereum_consensus 0.1.0) lib/lambda_ethereum_consensus/fork_choice/helpers.ex:107: LambdaEthereumConsensus.ForkChoice.Helpers.get_filtered_block_tree/1
    (lambda_ethereum_consensus 0.1.0) lib/lambda_ethereum_consensus/fork_choice/helpers.ex:36: LambdaEthereumConsensus.ForkChoice.Helpers.get_head/1
    (lambda_ethereum_consensus 0.1.0) lib/lambda_ethereum_consensus/fork_choice/fork_choice.ex:164: LambdaEthereumConsensus.ForkChoice.recompute_head/1
    (elixir 1.15.6) lib/task/supervised.ex:101: Task.Supervised.invoke_mfa/2
    (elixir 1.15.6) lib/task/supervised.ex:36: Task.Supervised.reply/4
Function: &LambdaEthereumConsensus.ForkChoice.recompute_head/1
    Args: [%Types.Store{time: 1709815005, genesis_time: 1638993340, justified_checkpoint: %Types.Checkpoint{root: <<88, 94, 62, 47, 193, 25, 72, 247, 14, 46, 246, 4, 187, 121, 72, 131, 118, 68, 233, 168, 219, 66, 35, 115, 157, 166, 59, 0, 60, 244, 127, 35>>, epoch: 885264}, finalized_checkpoint: %Types.Checkpoint{root: <<5, 192, 253, 43, 220, 0, 212, 190, 255, 65, 150, 97, 118, 227, 70, 41, 12, 183, 128, 106, 56, 208, 180, 233, 174, 118, 88, 229, 208, 33, 145, 96>>, epoch: 885263}, unrealized_justified_checkpoint: %Types.Checkpoint{root: <<88, 94, 62, 47, 193, 25, 72, 247, 14, 46, 246, 4, 187, 121, 72, 131, 118, 68, 233, 168, 219, 66, 35, 115, 157, 166, 59, 0, 60, 244, 127, 35>>, epoch: 885264}, unrealized_finalized_checkpoint: %Types.Checkpoint{root: <<5, 192, 253, 43, 220, 0, 212, 190, 255, 65, 150, 97, 118, 227, 70, 41, 12, 183, 128, 106, 56, 208, 180, 233, 174, 118, 88, 229, 208, 33, 145, 96>>, epoch: 885263}, ..., tree_cache: %LambdaEthereumConsensus.ForkChoice.Simple.Tree{root: <<5, 192, 253, 43, 220, 0, 212, 190, 255, 65, 150, 97, 118, 227, 70, 41, 12, 183, 128, 106, 56, 208, 180, 233, 174, 118, 88, 229, 208, 33, 145, 96>>, nodes: %{<<5, 192, 253, 43, 220, 0, 212, 190, 255, 65, 150, 97, 118, 227, 70, 41, 12, 183, 128, 106, 56, 208, 180, 233, 174, 118, 88, 229, 208, 33, 145, 96>> => %LambdaEthereumConsensus.ForkChoice.Simple.Tree.Node{parent_id: :root, children_ids: []}}}}]

Update: I think this happens when reloading ForkChoice after a crash

@MegaRedHand MegaRedHand added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 7, 2024
@mpaulucci mpaulucci added the P1 This is a MUST for this milestone. It's a main feature, or blocking other main features. label Apr 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working P1 This is a MUST for this milestone. It's a main feature, or blocking other main features.
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants