Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support machine readable output #972

Closed
neolit123 opened this issue Jul 4, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Support machine readable output #972

neolit123 opened this issue Jul 4, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/UX help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.

Comments

@neolit123
Copy link
Member

neolit123 commented Jul 4, 2018

1.12 planning doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YP8sCtgo58yqQ9sR4nsn9iuVFmglCCBMivCTwjd1ERE/edit#

adding this for tracking; it's outside of the GA scope.

token related: #659 (closed using a workaround)
upgrade related: #494

context:

kubeadm targets high-level automation tools as a first class use case, but it provides only a human readable output

@neolit123 neolit123 added priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. area/UX labels Jul 4, 2018
@neolit123 neolit123 added this to the v1.12 milestone Jul 4, 2018
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

@neolit123 see
#659 (closed using a workaround)
#494

@timothysc timothysc assigned liztio and unassigned timothysc Jul 10, 2018
@timothysc timothysc added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Jul 10, 2018
@chuckha chuckha modified the milestones: v1.12, GA Aug 15, 2018
@jberkus
Copy link

jberkus commented Aug 16, 2018

Just to be clear, while #659 was closed, the workarounds are hardly desireable. Users shouldn't need clever ansible tricks and/or regexes to automate "kubeadm join". I'm not quite following the proposed solution; does that give a way to call join on remote hosts that's easily scriptable via Ansible, Puppet, etc.?

Happy to test stuff.

@neolit123
Copy link
Member Author

i'd agree that those workarounds are not ideal.

in terms of this issue as a whole we had a talk today with the team (meeting had a rather limited staff) and decided to move this outside of 1.12, because we simply don't have the bandwidth to work on it.

if you know someone who is willing to work on this, that would be great!

@timothysc timothysc removed this from the GA milestone Oct 11, 2018
@stephaneeybert
Copy link

I'm now using Terraform and trying to build the join command from another server, and it's not easy.

@neolit123 neolit123 added the help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. label Dec 7, 2018
@timothysc
Copy link
Member

I'm going to close this one and leave the #494 one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/UX help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants