Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow creation of "Private Clusters" #903

Open
itspngu opened this issue Apr 21, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

Allow creation of "Private Clusters" #903

itspngu opened this issue Apr 21, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.

Comments

@itspngu
Copy link

itspngu commented Apr 21, 2023

/kind feature

Describe the solution you'd like
Currently, CAPG is hard-wired to create GCE load balancing components with a public IP address for apiserver access. The nodes themselves do not receive public addresses unless explicitly configured as such, the same should apply to the apiserver's endpoint(s). Being able to provision clusters with access limited by private IP address connectivity would be beneficial for obvious reasons.

Anything else you would like to add:
I'm not 100% sure if using private endpoints should be the default - it'd be in line with how address management for nodes currently works, but would also have potential for being a breaking change.

The GKE-specific concept of private clusters is explained here. This feature request is scoped at allowing this to apply for both managed (GKE) and unmanaged (plain Cluster API) clusters.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Apr 21, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 20, 2023
@itspngu
Copy link
Author

itspngu commented Jul 20, 2023

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 20, 2023
@lreciomelero
Copy link

lreciomelero commented Nov 27, 2023

Hi folks! Is it possible to take a look at this issue?

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 25, 2024
@itspngu
Copy link
Author

itspngu commented Feb 25, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 25, 2024
@mdbooth
Copy link

mdbooth commented Apr 18, 2024

We would like the same thing in https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-openstack. IIUC there are 2 constraints here, and neither is provider-specific:

  • CAPI only allows us to specify a single control plane endpoint. This is described in InfraCluster in the CAPI book.
  • The KubeadmControlPlane can only configure a single control plane endpoint.

I don't believe this can be resolved here, but I'm very interested in a solution.

cc @huxcrux

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants