We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I used sourcery to generate code for different cocoapods module, all modules depend on a module with defined sourcery protocols, such like this:
in protocol module: define sourcery protocol
in function module: define structs and implement the protocol
in function module podspec: define sourcery script two sources are specified: prorocol module and function module
normally, sourcey can generate expected code however, occasionally the code of module B is generated in module A, like this:
clean and rebuild can solve this problem, but this has a certain impact on the development efficiency. I hope to get a solution
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
you shouldn't specify exact file for output but a folder since they are constructed using template name by default
Sorry, something went wrong.
I tried , but the result is the same as before
This looks like multiple sourcery instances running at the same time, outputting the generated code to the wrong location
No branches or pull requests
I used sourcery to generate code for different cocoapods module, all modules depend on a module with defined sourcery protocols, such like this:
in protocol module:
define sourcery protocol
in function module:
define structs and implement the protocol
in function module podspec:
define sourcery script
two sources are specified: prorocol module and function module
normally, sourcey can generate expected code
however, occasionally the code of module B is generated in module A, like this:
clean and rebuild can solve this problem, but this has a certain impact on the development efficiency.
I hope to get a solution
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: