Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Using multithreading while fuzzing or wrap around other fuzzers #4

Closed
g0rchy opened this issue Mar 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Using multithreading while fuzzing or wrap around other fuzzers #4

g0rchy opened this issue Mar 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
@idrisschebak

Comments

@g0rchy
Copy link

g0rchy commented Mar 13, 2023

As the title says, using multithreading while fuzzing would be superior to single-threaded fuzzing, since it will speed up the process quite a bit.
@idrisschebak
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks, @g0rchy!

I'm currently testing the multithreading approach to speed up my fuzzing process while ensuring that it remains reliable and stable. Your feedback is much appreciated, and I'm excited to share the results with you soon. Stay tuned for some exciting fuzzing action!"

@idrisschebak idrisschebak self-assigned this Mar 13, 2023
@idrisschebak
Copy link
Collaborator

Done!

@idrisschebak idrisschebak pinned this issue Mar 13, 2023
@idrisschebak idrisschebak unpinned this issue Mar 13, 2023
@idrisschebak idrisschebak pinned this issue Mar 13, 2023
@idrisschebak idrisschebak reopened this Mar 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@idrisschebak idrisschebak

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@idrisschebak @g0rchy