Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cold Storage Support #888

Open
sashokbg opened this issue Sep 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Cold Storage Support #888

sashokbg opened this issue Sep 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@sashokbg
Copy link

Summary

As a k8up user,
I want to use cold storage for my swift backend
So that I pay less money for storage

Context

Many cloud providers provide cold storage options so that we can minimize cost for backups.

Currently however it is impossible to use cold storage with k8up because it stores the repository index and cache in the same cold storage which is not available immediately.

Recently a rustic feature has been merged that allows to specify --repo-hot option which will store the cache and index in a separate location in a normal swift / s3 storage.

rustic-rs/rustic#63

Out of Scope

No response

Further links

No response

Acceptance Criteria

No response

Implementation Ideas

No response

@sashokbg sashokbg added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 25, 2023
@sashokbg sashokbg changed the title Cold Storage Suppoer Cold Storage Support Sep 25, 2023
@Kidswiss
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @sashokbg

Thanks for bringing Rustic to my attention. There are a few features over Restic which K8up could greatly benefit from (especially the lock-free pruning). But the project page currently states, that they are in beta an failing regression tests. So it might take a while until we consider it to be a replacement for restic.

@sashokbg
Copy link
Author

Hello @Kidswiss ok I understand we will wait for the restic feature it be done then :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants