Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem about KITTI experiment MODE #9

Open
xuwuzhou opened this issue Sep 27, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Problem about KITTI experiment MODE #9

xuwuzhou opened this issue Sep 27, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@xuwuzhou
Copy link

Thanks for your good work, and I have some questions, wish for your reply.
Question No.1:This experiment seems that not support the mode which only input lidar and visual measurements. I am sure of this, because I have tried a variety of matching environments for nearly 10 days(Since I think it is a problem with environment at the beginning). In particular, the environments I have tried are recorded as:
A. a desktop with intel i710700+ ubuntu18+ ceres1.14+eigen3.3.7+opencv2.14.3+pcl1.7
B. a desktop with intel i710700+ ubuntu18+ ceres2+eigen3.3.7+opencv2.14.3+pcl1.7
C. a desktop with intel i710700+ ubuntu18+ ceres1.14+eigen3.3.7+opencv3.4.5+pcl1.7
D. a desktop with intel i710700+ ubuntu18+ ceres1.14+eigen3.3.7+opencv3.4.5+pcl1.8
E. a desktop with intel i710700+ ubuntu18+ ceres1.14+eigen3.3.7+opencv2.14.3+pcl1.8
F. a desktop with intel i710700+ ubuntu18+ ceres1.14+eigen3.3.7+opencv4.X.X+pcl1.8
G. a laptop with inteli7-6700+ ubuntu 16+ ceres1.14+eigen3.3.7+opencv2.14.1+pcl1.7
H. a laptop with inteli7-6700+ ubuntu 16+ ceres1.14+eigen3.3.7+opencv2.14.1+pcl1.8
I. a laptop with inteli7-6700 + ubuntu 16 + ceres1.14+eigen3.3.7+opencv3.4.5+pcl1.7
J. a laptop with inteli7-6700 + ubuntu 16 + ceres1.14+eigen3.3.7+opencv3.4.5+pcl1.8
K. a laptop with inteli7-6700 + ubuntu 16 + ceres1.14+eigen3.3.7+opencv4.X+pcl1.8
None of the above environments can run Mode( lidar+Camera), and always collapse for the same reason(As shown in the figures below)
2022-09-27 20-17-47 的屏幕截图
2022-09-27 20-18-13 的屏幕截图

@xuwuzhou
Copy link
Author

Question No.2: Last Year I opened issue6 #6 ,and find that the result generated by Mode(IMU+lidar+Camera) are
significantly worse than the result you showed in paper(Mode is IMU+GPS+lidar+Camera ).
The accuracy recorded by Mode(IMU+Lidar+Camera) is 16.22, and the accuracy recorded in your paper (Mode is GPS+IMU+Camera+Lidar) is 1.13.Why does this happen? What do you think is the reason? I guess it may be that the IMU data of KITTI is not accurate enough, leading to poor accuracy?
2022-09-27 20-44-46 的屏幕截图
2022-09-27 20-45-14 的屏幕截图

@xuwuzhou
Copy link
Author

Sincerely look forward to your reply, best wishes!

@xuwuzhou
Copy link
Author

@jypjypjypjyp

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant