Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Taking into account photometry that is possibly contaminated #55

Open
jpdeleon opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Taking into account photometry that is possibly contaminated #55

jpdeleon opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@jpdeleon
Copy link

jpdeleon commented Feb 15, 2024

I checked the librarian module and the catalog cross-matching is based on position. Given Gaia sources, can the Librarian class include a logic where a given photometry is excluded (or at least flagged) if there is any unresolved sources near the target? Right now, my heuristic is re-run ariadne until I discarded all photometries that deviate too much e.g. >3-sigma from the best-fit SED.

@jvines
Copy link
Owner

jvines commented Feb 20, 2024

I had planned on doing some sort of further quality check on the photometry but haven't gotten around to it. If you have an idea of how I could identify unresolved targets near the actual target, I'd be happy to hear it!

@jpdeleon
Copy link
Author

jpdeleon commented Apr 4, 2024

I don't have a specific solution but today I came across this paper (See Sec 2 & 3.1) which discusses how they take into account contamination in cross-matching.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants