Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 19, 2023. It is now read-only.

Ability to list unused items only #7

Open
homebysix opened this issue Jun 10, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Ability to list unused items only #7

homebysix opened this issue Jun 10, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@homebysix
Copy link
Contributor

The most useful thing to me about jss_helper is the ability to parse out which "things" in the JSS aren't being used at all. Thanks to the recent improvements, I can use the "scoped" and "excluded" verbs, plus some post-processing, to determine this. Thanks!

The next step would be a big cherry on top: The ability for jss_helper to tell me which items are unused with no additional post-processing needed on my part.

Something like jss_helper groups --unused perhaps, which would use the "scoped" and "excluded" verb on each group to determine whether it's referenced elsewhere.

@sheagcraig
Copy link
Collaborator

That's where Spruce steps in, I think.

On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:01 PM, Elliot Jordan <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

The most useful thing to me about jss_helper is the ability to parse out which "things" in the JSS aren't being used at all. Thanks to the recent improvements, I can use the "scoped" and "excluded" verbs, plus some post-processing, to determine this. Thanks!

The next step would be a big cherry on top: The ability for jss_helper to tell me which items are unused with no additional post-processing needed on my part.

Something like jss_helper groups --unused perhaps, which would use the "scoped" and "excluded" verb on each group to determine whether it's referenced elsewhere.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/7.

This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the intended recipient(s) only and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author.

@homebysix
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, I guess I'm still fuzzy on where the two projects overlap and where they don't. Spruce can't yet report on unused groups, right?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants