Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pyinstrument is very slow on django tests with docker #83

Open
patroqueeet opened this issue Dec 27, 2019 · 8 comments
Open

pyinstrument is very slow on django tests with docker #83

patroqueeet opened this issue Dec 27, 2019 · 8 comments

Comments

@patroqueeet
Copy link

Dear,

I'm trying to use pyinstrument on docker with a django test setup. When I run the command like this ./manage.py test --keepdb services.rest.tests.test_views:AddCompanyTestCase.test_add_company -v 3 I get something like

240.152 <module>  manage.py:2
└─ 239.407 execute_from_command_line  django/core/management/__init__.py:378
      [23227 frames hidden]  django, django_nose, nose, unittest, ...
         48.646 patched  mock/mock.py:1314
         └─ 48.625 test_add_company  services/rest/tests/test_views.py:59
            ├─ 21.667 post  rest_framework/test.py:296
            │     [770 frames hidden]  rest_framework, django, reversion, se...
            │        21.055 inner  django/core/handlers/exception.py:31
            │        └─ 21.055 __call__  company/middleware.py:28
            │           └─ 21.036 inner  django/core/handlers/exception.py:31
            │              └─ 21.036 __call__  project/middleware.py:10
            │                 └─ 21.036 inner  django/core/handlers/exception.py:31
            │                       [106 frames hidden]  django, rest_framework, re, sre_compi...
            │                          20.995 dispatch  rest_framework/views.py:470
            │                          └─ 20.982 post  services/rest/views.py:813
            │                             └─ 20.851 save  rest_framework/serializers.py:171
            │                                └─ 20.851 create  services/rest/serializers.py:279
            │                                   ├─ 9.561 __get__  django/db/models/fields/related_descriptors.py:373
            │                                   │     [72 frames hidden]  django, raven, weakref
            │                                   ├─ 6.187 now  django/utils/timezone.py:218
            │                                   │     [2 frames hidden]  django
            │                                   └─ 4.289 [self]
            ├─ 19.563 reverse  django/urls/base.py:27
            │     [718 frames hidden]  django, re, sre_compile, sre_parse, e...
            │        4.988 import_module  importlib/__init__.py:109
            │        └─ 4.972 <module>  project/urls.py:1
            └─ 7.285 generate  project/generators.py:151
               └─ 7.281 _make_user  project/generators.py:64
                  ├─ 3.613 _make_username  project/generators.py:54
                  │  └─ 3.612 _make_wordlist  project/generators.py:47
                  │     └─ 3.612 <listcomp>  project/generators.py:49
                  │        └─ 3.602 [self]
                  └─ 3.368 _make_wordlist  project/generators.py:47
                     └─ 3.368 <listcomp>  project/generators.py:49
                        └─ 3.344 [self]
         9.312 load_source  imp.py:165
         └─ 9.291 <module>  services/rest/tests/test_views.py:2
            └─ 4.866 <module>  services/rest/serializers.py:1
               └─ 3.759 <module>  dictdiffer/__init__.py:11
                     [327 frames hidden]  dictdiffer, pkg_resources, re, posixp...
         40.742 import_module  importlib/__init__.py:109
         ├─ 28.759 <module>  shareholder/models.py:1
         │  ├─ 22.735 UserProfile  shareholder/models.py:1117
         │  │  └─ 22.726 __init__  django_languages/fields.py:7
         │  │        [11 frames hidden]  django_languages, django
         │  └─ 2.528 <module>  utils/pdf.py:1
         │     └─ 2.511 <module>  xhtml2pdf/pisa.py:16
         │           [1405 frames hidden]  xhtml2pdf, reportlab, re, sre_compile...
         47.142 import_module  importlib/__init__.py:109
         └─ 47.118 <module>  project/__init__.py:5
            ├─ 39.173 <module>  project/signals.py:4
            │  ├─ 25.066 <module>  registration/signals.py:1
            │  │     [26 frames hidden]  registration, django, importlib, path...
            │  │        25.032 import_module  importlib/__init__.py:109
            │  │        └─ 24.990 <module>  project/settings/dev.py:1
            │  │           └─ 24.953 <module>  project/settings/base.py:12
            │  │              ├─ 19.513 <module>  project/settings/tests.py:4
            │  │              │  └─ 19.512 stack  inspect.py:1511
            │  │              │        [278 frames hidden]  inspect, posixpath, genericpath, cele...
            │  │              └─ 4.018 <module>  raven/__init__.py:7
            │  │                    [951 frames hidden]  raven, requests, urllib3, re, sre_com...
            │  ├─ 8.870 <module>  services/slack.py:3
            │  │  └─ 8.728 register_task  celery/app/base.py:488
            │  │        [319 frames hidden]  celery, kombu, collections, logging, ...
            │  │           8.552 send  celery/utils/dispatch/signal.py:266
            │  │           └─ 8.550 setup_periodic_tasks  project/celery.py:32
            │  │              └─ 8.360 <module>  company/tasks.py:9
            │  │                 └─ 6.836 <module>  bs4/__init__.py:18
            │  │                       [3025 frames hidden]  bs4, soupsieve, re, sre_compile, sre_...
            │  └─ 5.143 <module>  django/contrib/auth/__init__.py:1
            │        [2516 frames hidden]  django, pathlib, re, sre_compile, sre...
            └─ 7.762 <module>  project/celery.py:6
               └─ 6.292 <module>  celery/schedules.py:2
                     [1914 frames hidden]  celery, kombu, importlib_metadata, re...

where even now takes 6s. Without pyinstrument this test takes about ~30s and I need to find out why...

What other information do you need from my side?

@joerick
Copy link
Owner

joerick commented Dec 27, 2019

Hi @patroqueeet, how are you invoking pyinstrument?

@patroqueeet
Copy link
Author

patroqueeet commented Jul 6, 2020

sry for the slight delay :/

in docker I do docker-compose exec app pyinstrument ./manage.py test --keepdb services.rest.tests.test_views:AddCompanyTestCase.test_add_company -v 3./manage.py test --keepdb services -e functional -v 2 --failed

Generally spoken: intention is to identify what slows down my tests... including setUp() etc.

@joerick
Copy link
Owner

joerick commented Aug 21, 2020

Not sure what's going on here tbh... my tests in Docker seem to work just as normal. Are you able to make a minimal recreation?

@patroqueeet
Copy link
Author

@joerick sure. will go and make a docker image for you to reproduce...

@patroqueeet
Copy link
Author

Hey, tried with a simple model test on docker and found all working as expected. But the problems come on a large Py3 project.

Hence, closing this until I have some further reproducible truth.

Still: for the records https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62220875/profiling-python-in-a-docker-container-is-very-slow-cprofile-and-pyinstrument more people having this issue...

@joerick
Copy link
Owner

joerick commented Sep 16, 2020

Thanks for taking another look! If the problem occurs in cProfile too, it's probably at a lower level than we can fix.

A wild guess at the cause would have me thinking about the gettimeofday syscall in pyinstrument_cext - perhaps this is slower in some Docker containers. This article might add some weight to the idea...

@joerick
Copy link
Owner

joerick commented Dec 16, 2020

I had a thought on this - pyinstrument_cext could add a feature where, rather than calling gettimeofday on every trace event, it checks an internal variable that's being incremented by a thread who is running in a tight loop doing usleep. Perhaps this would be worse performance for systems with vDSO, but it would definitely improve things otherwise...

@joerick joerick reopened this Dec 16, 2020
@patroqueeet
Copy link
Author

hey, to be honest, I cannot judge if your wild guess is going in the right direction. if you provide me a branch/PR I can check it out and give you some feedback.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants