Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unable to find Espressif esptool on your system... #54

Open
Yutao-Jin opened this issue Oct 23, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Unable to find Espressif esptool on your system... #54

Yutao-Jin opened this issue Oct 23, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@Yutao-Jin
Copy link

First of all, MPY Jama is amazing!!!!

when I use the firmware tool on the MPY Jama, it shows me "Unable to find Espressif esptool on your system..."
even though I have followed the instructions to install the esptool, both through the pip and home-brew
I'm using a MacBook pro m1 and on macos 16.0
image

@bhrobinson
Copy link

you need to add it to your path:

export PATH="/opt/homebrew/Cellar/esptool/4.6.2_3/bin:$PATH"

@coyte
Copy link

coyte commented Dec 13, 2023

Hitting the same issue on M1 Mac Ventura. Setting the PATH variable as suggested does not resolve the issue. PATH works a bit different for MAC in that only the processes started from shell will inherit the value. Applications launched in any other way do not.
While launching the app from finder gives me the issue not finding esptool, if I launch the app from the terminal, using "/Applications/ESP32\ MPY-Jama.app/Contents/MacOS/ESP32\ MPY-Jama", works correctly due to the path setting being present.
Suggestion is to add a configurable parameter to the Mac version of the app in which to set the location of esptool.

@FabianClemenz
Copy link

Same problem for me - MPY Jama can't find the esptool but it is installed and in my path. As @coyte mentioned - starting from terminal esptool is found

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants