Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specify behavior better #3

Open
Blaisorblade opened this issue Jun 5, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Specify behavior better #3

Blaisorblade opened this issue Jun 5, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@Blaisorblade
Copy link

UnivEq proves that "equals correctly defines the equality".
But I could neither find a definition of what that should mean, nor documentation on how that is proved. All implementation of equals must be correct according to equals contract. Do you simply talk about implementations that aren't the default reference equality? Or what?

This issue was born while trying to better understand scala/scala3#1247 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant