-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Not an issue but a question #14
Comments
Dear Jake, def select_all_associated(conn, f0, project_folder, dirname): Of course the variable dirname has to be passed also to the "combine_associated" function (def combine_associated(project_folder=None, project_code=None, dirname=None, catalog_year=False, year=None, hypoflag=False, eventmode=False):) Let me know if you will think about integrating that modification or solve the location code issue in an other way ? Regards |
Dear Jake,
I am doing some test with your easyQuake suite. It is a very nice "integrated" solution.
I am facing an issue about the location codes of the seismic stations. My network uses location codes (ie 00) but it seems that easyQuake suite drops the location code, and in the catalog produced all the station with pick have location empty location code.
This quite an issue when using after the catalog produced to review the event (with Seiscomp in my case).
Is there an easy way to modify the code ?
Or should I go deep inside to make the modification.
I encountered the same issue with EQT (I am also testing it in standalone mode), and I have had to make some modification in the associator.py script to take the location code in account.
Maybe, if it not easily faisible with the actual easyquake code you may give me some inputs on where I have to search in the code to use the location code of the stations ?
Hope my message is ok, maybe not really clear with my french-english...
Thanks in advance for you answer.
Regards,
Mickael.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: