Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 18, 2021. It is now read-only.

Should we use Github's official feedback repo? #1955

Closed
markcellus opened this issue Apr 10, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Should we use Github's official feedback repo? #1955

markcellus opened this issue Apr 10, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
comments duplicate enhancement github/feedback Also filed in or related to official github/feedback repo issues meta WIP

Comments

@markcellus
Copy link

Hey @isaacs! Really love this repo and the feedback and conversations have been awesome. But now that we have https://github.com/github/feedback/discussions, does it make sense to retire this repository?

@TPS
Copy link
Collaborator

TPS commented May 1, 2021

@markcellus This has been answered @ the canonical issue. In short, you missed the description of that repo: "Public feedback discussions for: GitHub Mobile, GitHub Discussions, GitHub Codespaces and GitHub Sponsors" (only).

@TPS TPS added the duplicate label May 1, 2021
@TPS TPS closed this as completed May 1, 2021
@markcellus
Copy link
Author

Who is this @TPS person and why can I not add a confused reaction to the comment left here?

@TPS
Copy link
Collaborator

TPS commented May 28, 2021

@markcellus
I'm a collaborator on this repo (so, essentially, a volunteer moderator).

As for your reaction, I was able to add 😕 to your comment. If you can't add such to comments, maybe try https://support.github.com/?

@TPS
Copy link
Collaborator

TPS commented Jun 7, 2021

@markcellus You're getting your wish: Per #1967 & #1985, this is exactly what's happening. But leaving this issue closed duplicate, in favor of those. 🙇🏾‍♂️

@aspiers aspiers added the github/feedback Also filed in or related to official github/feedback repo label Aug 25, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
comments duplicate enhancement github/feedback Also filed in or related to official github/feedback repo issues meta WIP
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants