Migrate to Monorepo

[Lord-Valen]

CC @acald-creator @PodaruDragos @Jameskmonger

In the Inversify Discord server, moving the inversify projects to a monorepo was being discussed. I find that these sorts of things usually benefit from a tracking issue so that a clear goal is defined and anyone can pick up the task. The general consensus appears to be that the repos would be migrated to npm/yarn workspaces. Lerna and NX were considered. I would like to open that up to include Rush and Turborepo. If shying away from workspaces, then NX and Turborepo are preferable for their caching and fast build times.

[PodaruDragos]

My idea was, if, we have "native" support for monorepos using workspaces, just go with that.
for example as preact does.

@Lord-Valen If you want to pick that up, feel free to give it a go.

[notaphplover]

I would say package manager workspaces are not good enough.

Monorepo frameworks solves a lot of problems when working with monorepos, the first that comes to my mind is: given a task, which packages should be targeted? Which is the best execution plan given the actual package dependencies?

After having tried old lerna, new lerna, nx and turborepo, I highly prefer turborepo over the other ones. It's very actively maintained, popular, suported by vercel and mature enought to go for it imho.