Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Validation mechanism for SPSP #582

Open
AlexLakatos opened this issue Nov 30, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Add Validation mechanism for SPSP #582

AlexLakatos opened this issue Nov 30, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@AlexLakatos
Copy link
Member

receipts_enabled
shared_secret
destination_account

From @marcoscaceres: Would be nice if the SPSP has an algorithm to hook directly into for validation. And it returned true or false. So... "perform simple payment validation", which takes a json object.

@sublimator
Copy link
Member

Have been thinking along those lines myself.
But true/false seems less leaky than returning a balance (having said that you probably already know this anyway, from the receipt you have)

Would this require some kind of PKI ? The SPSP endpoint would need a lot more state.

With the current receipt model, backends integrating WM need to make requests to some receipt verifier upon each packet to "verify". So why not require a request to some SPSP endpoint?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 18, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

If this issue is important, please feel free to bring it up on the next Interledger Community Group Call or in the Gitter chat.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Apr 18, 2022
@Starrcisco
Copy link

receipts_enabled shared_secret destination_account

From @marcoscaceres: Would be nice if the SPSP has an algorithm to hook directly into for validation. And it returned true or false. So... "perform simple payment validation", which takes a json object.

Please let me know

@stale stale bot removed the wontfix label Aug 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants