Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why I got much less PS points than the paper for the Mud Creek landslide case? #84

Open
wenyangmao opened this issue Mar 18, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@wenyangmao
Copy link

wenyangmao commented Mar 18, 2024

Hello @mirzaees ,

When I using the following miaplpy paramters to do the Mud Creek landslide case, the PS result seems much less than the paper.

miaplpy.inversion.rangeWindow = 19 # range window size for searching SHPs, auto for 15
miaplpy.inversion.azimuthWindow = 9 # azimuth window size for searching SHPs, auto for 15
miaplpy.inversion.PsNumShp = 10 # auto for 10, number of shps for ps candidates
miaplpy.inversion.shpTest = ks

miaplpy.interferograms.networkType = delaunay
miaplpy.interferograms.delaunayPerpThresh = 200
miaplpy.interferograms.delaunayTempThresh = 60
miaplpy.interferograms.ministackSize = 10

miaplpy.timeseries.minTempCoh = 0.5
miaplpy.timeseries.tempCohType = average

MudCreek

I wonder to know how to increase the PS numbers as the paper.
Thank you very much.

@mirzaees
Copy link
Collaborator

mirzaees commented Apr 4, 2024

Hi @wenyangmao
what time period are you processing? is it same as paper(2015-May 2017)?

@wenyangmao
Copy link
Author

wenyangmao commented Apr 5, 2024

@mirzaees ,

Hi @wenyangmao what time period are you processing? is it same as paper(2015-May 2017)?

Yes. It is the same as your case. It is from 20150524T to 20170119.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants