Genesis transactions inconsistency #3863
Labels
good first issue
Good for newcomers
iroha2-dev
The re-implementation of a BFT hyperledger in RUST
question
Further information is requested
This is how genesis block is represented in the schema:
First of all it's not composed of transactions, but of a double list of instructions. Either we should make it a single vector of instructions like this (notice rename from
transactions
->instructions
):or we're going to use a proper transaction
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: