Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Creating Fabric components using Operator UI/API #173

Open
mushirneo opened this issue Jun 15, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Creating Fabric components using Operator UI/API #173

mushirneo opened this issue Jun 15, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@mushirneo
Copy link

mushirneo commented Jun 15, 2023

What happened?

I had deployed my HLF network using bevel-operator fabric. Next I deployed the UI & API pod with the help of documentation. When I created the CA through the operator UI, the pod always remains in PENDING stage & does not bring up the pod in RUNNING status.
image

What did you expect to happen?

On creating fabric entities through UI, it should normally work as expected and the pod should be up & running.

How can we reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?

By deploying the UI/API pod and accessing it by port forwarding.

Anything else we need to know?

On debugging i came to know to know that the PVC volume does not bind properly which restricts the CA pod too be up & running because on creating the CA, in the UI it does not load the standard storage class in the select list & because of that it maps to default & not standard storage class. Since I am trying it on KinD local cluster, here standard is the default storage class available.
image

I am not sure why is it not loading the available storage classes of kubernetes cluster here in select list?

I also ran the GetStorageClasses GraphQL query but the data seems to be returning is a blank array.

image

Kubernetes version

# kubectl get nodes -o wide
@mushirneo mushirneo changed the title Creating Fabric components using UI/API Creating Fabric components using Operator UI/API Jun 15, 2023
@adityajoshi12
Copy link
Contributor

The operator UI is not tested completely, these can be unexpected bugs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants