New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Think of a better representation of Protocols AST #104

Open

pepegar opened this issue Jul 5, 2019 · 0 comments

Member

pepegar commented Jul 5, 2019

Currently we are putting a lot of effort in Types AST but we're not considering Protocols AST. Some things that we might want to consider:

It should work for both sync and async IDLs (think asyncapi/pact)
2.It should work for RPC style IDLs and HTTP IDLs.

diesalbla added the Core label

github-actions bot removed the Core label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment