Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VoNR SCSCF forwarding INVITE message with wrong request-uri #298

Open
wasdwasdwa opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

VoNR SCSCF forwarding INVITE message with wrong request-uri #298

wasdwasdwa opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@wasdwasdwa
Copy link

I set up VoNR environment, DOCKER_HOST_IP is 192.168.116.141, msisdn is +8618107550095. After UE triggers INVITE message, because of upf repeatedly forwards sip messages for unknown reasons, when SCSCF forwards the message for the third time, it adds a "+" in request-uri, which causes 604 Hss User Unknown error.
1712130033063

Could you please take a look? Thanks.
pcap log:
0403-4.zip

@NUCLEAR-WAR
Copy link

NUCLEAR-WAR commented Apr 3, 2024

You should not dial the Number with +, only with 00, you may able to change it tho, the extra + is not from SCSCF its from ENUM Answer, you need to remove the + in the e164.arpa in dns folder and it will go

@shanewshh
Copy link

I meet the similar issue that upf always repeatedly forward the messages to Kamailio, it might have negative effect on the robustness of the Kamailio's function. Could you please kindly have a look on this? Thank you in advance! @herlesupreeth

@shanewshh
Copy link

Upload the .pcap
0401-3.pcap.zip

@herlesupreeth
Copy link
Owner

@wasdwasdwa That is because you have set MSISDN with + in the HSS and when you dial a number with + and later on upon resolving the IMS identity (which has a +) you see two + in the Request-URI. Please remove + from the MSISDN in HSS and also while dialing dont use +.

@shanewshh I dont see any issue the pcap you attached

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants