Do you welcome new integrations? #590
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
Hi @binwiederhier, ntfy.sh looks nifty! I like the simplicity, and the openness of it, kudos! I'm open to adding new integrations, my main criteria for deciding what to add is end-user interest (across Github issues, private emails, tweets, etc.). Some other aspects are:
On the last point, it looks like ntfy has awesomely-simple API that is easy to use via webhook integration: I would not make a custom integration for ntfy myself (no end users have asked for it, and webhooks work fine). But if you make a complete PR, I would accept, because it seems the extra maintenance burden would be low to none. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you for getting back to me @cuu508, I appreciate the thorough response. And you even tried it :-)
I acknowledge that other than myself, there is no interest right now. I am obviously trying to build it out, including integrations into tools such as healthchecks.io. So I wouldn't be offended if you said no :-)
Good call on the webhooks integration. Nice that it just works.
That is fantastic to hear. I'll create a PR in the next couple of days, including the docs and all that. I created this ticket for it: binwiederhier/ntfy#49 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I see a lot of open issues for new integrations. If I were to add my own service (https://ntfy.sh) as an integration (i.e. contribute code), would that be welcome, or do you think you have enough integrations?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions