Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for VM latency sensitivity "High with Hyperthreading" #2169

Open
4 tasks done
Guerckan opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
4 tasks done

Add support for VM latency sensitivity "High with Hyperthreading" #2169

Guerckan opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement Type: Enhancement

Comments

@Guerckan
Copy link

Guerckan commented Apr 16, 2024

Community Guidelines

  • I have read and agree to the HashiCorp Community Guidelines .
  • Vote on this issue by adding a 馃憤 reaction to the original issue initial description to help the maintainers prioritize.
  • Do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant information or questions.
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment.

Description

As introduced by vSphere 8.0, the "latency sensitivity" virtual machine setting now has a new possible value named "High with Hyperthreading".
See VMWare documentation supporting this statement : https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-vSphere/8.0/vsphere-vm-administration/GUID-F5DAC793-7B13-418F-949E-0CD80CEC5D1E.html

Current provider implementation (2.7.0 at the time of writing) of the resource vsphere_virtual_machine does not support this new value as specified here : https://registry.terraform.io/providers/hashicorp/vsphere/latest/docs/resources/virtual_machine#latency_sensitivity

Use Case(s)

This setting is particularly interesting for network appliances virtual machines and the new functionality of "high with hyperthreading" offers a way to reduce the computing power footprint of a latency sensitivity "high" setting on the host without sacrificing much of its advantages.

Potential Terraform Provider Configuration

No response

References

No response

@Guerckan Guerckan added the enhancement Type: Enhancement label Apr 16, 2024
Copy link

Hello, Guerckan! 馃枑

Thank you for submitting an issue for this provider. The issue will now enter into the issue lifecycle.

If you want to contribute to this project, please review the contributing guidelines and information on submitting pull requests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Type: Enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant