This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 21, 2022. It is now read-only.
Consider dropping the entire section on static checking (including 'sealed') #150
Labels
accepted
Discussion leading to a final decision to include in the PEP
fully pepped
Issues that have been fully documented in the PEP
sc-feedback
Issues raised in the steering committee feedback
Comments
gvanrossum
added
the
sc-feedback
|
Agreed. Perhaps this is also something that might best be put into a separate PEP if we want to follow up on this. |
|
+1 |
|
+1 to simplify and use a future PEP if desired. |
|
Agreed. I believe we just inherited it without modification from Ivan's first draft. |
gvanrossum
added
accepted
|
Done. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
This section caused mostly confusion and bewilderment, and I don't consider it essential for the PEP. Static checkers have always managed to figure out how best to check existing Python constructs without formal specifications.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: