Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support more OSM tags for selecting stops #100

Open
ialokim opened this issue Dec 14, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Support more OSM tags for selecting stops #100

ialokim opened this issue Dec 14, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@ialokim
Copy link
Contributor

ialokim commented Dec 14, 2017

As pointed out here and here, the current code of the OsmConnector class is very specific to buses. We should change that after merging in #99.

@xamanu
Copy link
Contributor

xamanu commented Dec 25, 2017

The comments you linked mostly refer to including nodes with public_transport=stop_position as potential stop candidate, instead of only selecting public_transport=platform; same for its role in the route relation. As a constraint we have to male sure that either one or another is taken. Not both.

And there is also highway=bus_stop widely used and we might want to support it.

I guess we'd have to implement a new setting in the config file:

  • stop_type=platform (default if omitted)
  • stop_type=stop_position

@xamanu xamanu changed the title Support more OSM tags in OsmConnector Support more OSM tags for selecting stops Dec 25, 2017
@stronk7
Copy link

stronk7 commented Jan 2, 2021

Not the same, but somehow related... I've found that, while fetching information from OSM, both platform_entry_only and platform_exit_only (PT2 good practice, if I'm not wrong) are completely ignored and only relation elements with role platform are considered.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants