Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LMO calculation for alkali atoms #1033

Open
UlysseFerier opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

LMO calculation for alkali atoms #1033

UlysseFerier opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
unconfirmed This report has not yet been confirmed by the developers

Comments

@UlysseFerier
Copy link

XTB.txt
Na+.txt

This ticket describes the issue encountered when calculating the different LMO with alkali atoms (Na+ or K+). XTB version : XTB/6.7.0. Here we focus on the LMO of Na+.

The command line is the following :
xtb Na+.xyz --gbsa h2o --verbose --lmo --chrg 1
The input coordinates is the "Na+.txt" file and the results are in the "XTB.txt" file.

The Intel MKL ERROR with the matrix multiplication (Parameters 10 and 13) was encountered :

   *** convergence criteria satisfied after 3 iterations ***

         #    Occupation            Energy/Eh            Energy/eV
      -------------------------------------------------------------
         1                         -0.4351868             -11.8420 (LUMO)
         2                         -0.1510027              -4.1090
         3                         -0.1510027              -4.1090
         4                         -0.1510027              -4.1090
      -------------------------------------------------------------
                  HL-Gap           -0.4351868 Eh          -11.8420 eV
             Fermi-level                  NaN Eh               NaN eV
 
 localization/xTB-IFF output generation
 averaging CT terms over            1  virt. levels

Intel MKL ERROR: Parameter 13 was incorrect on entry to DGEMM .

Intel MKL ERROR: Parameter 13 was incorrect on entry to DGEMM .

Intel MKL ERROR: Parameter 13 was incorrect on entry to DGEMM .
 dipole moment from electron density (au)
     X       Y       Z   
   0.0000   0.0000   0.0000  total (Debye):    0.000
cpu  time for init local    0.08 s
wall time for init local    0.00 s
 doing rotations ...
 initialization of trafo matrix to unity
 doing transformations ...

Intel MKL ERROR: Parameter 10 was incorrect on entry to DGEMM .
 lmo centers(Z=2) and atoms on file <lmocent.coord>
 LMO Fii/eV  ncent    charge center   contributions...
 files:
 coordprot.0/xtbscreen.xyz/xtblmoinfo/lmocent.coord
 with protonation site input, xtbdock and
 LMO center info written
 

 SCC (total)                   0 d,  0 h,  0 min,  0.087 sec
 SCC setup                      ...        0 min,  0.002 sec (  1.828%)
 Dispersion                     ...        0 min,  0.001 sec (  1.061%)
 classical contributions        ...        0 min,  0.001 sec (  0.620%)
 integral evaluation            ...        0 min,  0.001 sec (  0.943%)
 iterations                     ...        0 min,  0.076 sec ( 87.142%)
 molecular gradient             ...        0 min,  0.004 sec (  4.639%)
 printout                       ...        0 min,  0.003 sec (  3.475%)

Also, the HOMO and HOMO-LUMO gap energies were calculated to be 0 as shown in the summary of the electronical properties of Na+ :

         :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
         ::                     SUMMARY                     ::
         :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
         :: total energy               0.081651941414 Eh    ::
         :: total w/o Gsasa/hb         0.104066244016 Eh    ::
         :: gradient norm              0.000000000000 Eh/a0 ::
         :: HOMO-LUMO gap              0.000000000000 eV    ::
         ::.................................................::
         :: HOMO orbital eigv.         0.000000000000 eV    ::
         :: LUMO orbital eigv.       -11.842035706478 eV    ::
         ::.................................................::
         :: SCC energy                 0.081651941414 Eh    ::
         :: -> isotropic ES            0.195485566667 Eh    ::
         :: -> anisotropic ES          0.000000000000 Eh    ::
         :: -> anisotropic XC          0.000000000000 Eh    ::
         :: -> dispersion              0.000000000000 Eh    ::
         :: -> Gsolv                  -0.113833625253 Eh    ::
         ::    -> Gelec               -0.091419322651 Eh    ::
         ::    -> Gsasa               -0.024271745729 Eh    ::
         ::    -> Ghb                  0.000000000000 Eh    ::
         ::    -> Gshift               0.001857443127 Eh    ::
         :: repulsion energy           0.000000000000 Eh    ::
         :: add. restraining           0.000000000000 Eh    ::
         :: total charge               1.000000000000 e     ::
         ::.................................................::
         :: atomisation energy        -0.248748691235 Eh    ::
         :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

The same issues are found when calculating the LMO of K+.

@UlysseFerier UlysseFerier added the unconfirmed This report has not yet been confirmed by the developers label May 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
unconfirmed This report has not yet been confirmed by the developers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant