Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimization Error for Ag Metal Complex #1000

Open
deveshawasthi10 opened this issue Mar 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Optimization Error for Ag Metal Complex #1000

deveshawasthi10 opened this issue Mar 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
method: xTB Related to the xTB Hamiltonian and its parametrisations

Comments

@deveshawasthi10
Copy link

Describe the bug
Not able to optimize the Ag metal complex. xtb properly working for Cu and Au complex but when I change the metal from Cu to Ag xtb terminates abnormally.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behaviour:
full_Ag.txt

This is the xyz file of the molecule which I want to optimize.

  1. happens with input full_Ag.txt
  2. xtb full_Ag.xyz --opt --verbose --iterations 750
  3. run xtb
  4. output showing the error:
    full_Ag3.txt

full Ag3.txt is the output showing the error

Expected behaviour
I expected it to properly optimize the Ag geometry as well.

Additional context
I also truncated this big system to a smaller model, that system also properly optimized, when the Metals were Cu and Au. But, gave me abnormal termination when I used Ag as the metal.

The system has zero charge. System is closed shell singlet.

@deveshawasthi10 deveshawasthi10 added the unconfirmed This report has not yet been confirmed by the developers label Mar 22, 2024
@Albkat Albkat added the method: xTB Related to the xTB Hamiltonian and its parametrisations label Apr 16, 2024
@Albkat
Copy link
Contributor

Albkat commented Apr 16, 2024

Hi,

The issue you're experiencing with transition metals in GFN2-xTB is a known problem, primarily due to the multipole electrostatic term. I recommend using GFN1-xTB instead (I've already tested it with your system, and it works well).

For an overview of xtb’s performance with transition metal complexes, please refer to this paper.

@Albkat Albkat removed the unconfirmed This report has not yet been confirmed by the developers label Apr 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
method: xTB Related to the xTB Hamiltonian and its parametrisations
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants