end node of primary_link visible on junction to teritary street

[pointhi]

http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/47.93853/13.79606

The primary_link street rendering stop by the teritary street, but the rest of the round end node is visible on the other side of the street.

[pnorman]

This is basically the same as #84. We closed that one as being fairly uncommon and difficult to fix.
This one is any intersection of secondary_link or higher links and tertiary roads. I could probably identify the cases, but if so, I don't even know if they're fixable

[dieterdreist]

one could argue that this is bad mapping, and that the connection should be tertiary as well, if this were a primary connection it wouldn't continue as tertiary.

[pnorman]

This occurs with correct mapping. I was able to find about a dozen places locally where a primary_link intersects a secondary or tertiary road at about 90 degrees. You don't see it on secondary because it's the same width, and you don't see it if there's a primary_link on both sides either.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/49.27638/-122.82832

http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/49.27757/-122.86482

http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/49.26013/-122.90869

[Rovastar]

In that case #265 will probably fix it.

[pnorman]

In that case #265 will probably fix it.

Probably not - secondaries wider than tertiaries is expected

[Rovastar]

I just presumed all these connections were link highways. And therefore would have a much reduced width.

[Rovastar]

But reading #265 again I realise I didn't actually mention the fact that the intention is to have also have links width thinner than the normal highway equivalent. Sorry about that.

[gravitystorm]

as @pnorman said, duplicate of #84