Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Initial implementation #1

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Nov 7, 2021
Merged

feat: Initial implementation #1

merged 7 commits into from Nov 7, 2021

Conversation

phated
Copy link
Member

@phated phated commented Nov 6, 2021

This is my initial implementation of libbinaryen packaged for opam. It uses a lot of the work that @ospencer originally did for binaryen.ml but we have a working cmake on Windows now when installing with esy鈥攐pam, as always, is a whole other story...

Additionally, I figured out how to build Binaryen inside an OCaml environment in both esy & opam on Windows (take all of my tears 馃槶 )

I added a smoke test to this repository to show that bindings can actually be written, which helped me find a bunch of problems on Windows. But I also have Binaryen.ml using this as a resolution to test everything is working at grain-lang/binaryen.ml#113

I still need to add the grainbot automation and I need to use https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#how-do-i-change-the-version-number when merging this to stick to the v101.0.0 version to align with Binaryen

@phated phated requested a review from ospencer November 6, 2021 23:05
Copy link
Member

@ospencer ospencer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Beautiful beautiful incantations here sir! 馃

No complaints from me!

@phated phated merged commit 9da8c77 into main Nov 7, 2021
@phated phated deleted the phated/impl branch November 7, 2021 04:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants