Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

如何快速套用到我们的场景 #784

Open
iamhamu opened this issue Oct 9, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

如何快速套用到我们的场景 #784

iamhamu opened this issue Oct 9, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@iamhamu
Copy link

iamhamu commented Oct 9, 2023

我们是一家初创公司,正准备用Gorse搭建一套简单的推荐系统,遇到了一个问题。我注意到上面的相似算法更多的是采用物品本身的特征作为标签,没有采用物品的受欢迎程度(只有正反馈,但是不关注不是最终优化目标的那些次级指标)。
举个例子,我们做视频推荐,一般会关注内容本身什么分类,有那些主题,作者是谁等等(这些作为内容的标签是相对容易套入的)。很多时候我们还会关注这个内容本身的点击率,完播率,人均观看时长等等这些指标。后面这些消费性的特征如何体现呢?

另外如果要给最终的优化目标做多目标加权怎么搞呢?

感谢解答。

@Issues-translate-bot
Copy link

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. 👯👭🏻🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏻👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏿👬🏿


We are a start-up company and are preparing to build a simple recommendation system using Gorse, but we encountered a problem. I noticed that the similar algorithm above uses more of the characteristics of the item itself as the label, and does not use the popularity of the item (only positive feedback, but does not pay attention to those secondary indicators that are not the final optimization goal).
For example, when we make video recommendations, we usually focus on the classification of the content itself, what topics it has, who the author is, etc. (These are relatively easy to apply as content tags). Many times we will also pay attention to the click-through rate, completion rate, per capita viewing time and other indicators of the content itself. How are these latter consumer characteristics reflected?

In addition, what if we want to do multi-objective weighting for the final optimization goal?

Thanks for the answer.

@alicksnake22
Copy link

可以自己配置正向因素的

@Issues-translate-bot
Copy link

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. 👯👭🏻🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏻👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏿👬🏿


You can configure the positive factors yourself

@kolychen
Copy link

kolychen commented Apr 2, 2024

可以自己配置正向因素的

但是不能配置正向因数的权重把,反馈也有分权重,比如可能更在意完播率

@Issues-translate-bot
Copy link

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically. 👯👭🏻🧑‍🤝‍🧑👫🧑🏿‍🤝‍🧑🏻👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏿👬🏿


You can configure the positive factors yourself

However, the weight of the forward factor cannot be configured. Feedback also has weights. For example, you may be more concerned about the completion rate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants