Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: do not append duplicates to user agent string #570

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Sep 2, 2021

Conversation

ddelgrosso1
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

  • Make sure to open an issue as a bug/issue before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
  • Ensure the tests and linter pass
  • Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #565 🦕

@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 requested a review from a team September 1, 2021 17:29
@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 1, 2021 17:29
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Sep 1, 2021
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/python-storage API. label Sep 1, 2021
@cojenco cojenco added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Sep 1, 2021
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Sep 1, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@tseaver tseaver left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ddelgrosso1 Can you please add a unit test which reproduces the issue (i.e., failing with this change not applied, but passing with it applied)?

google/cloud/storage/_http.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Move agent_version to a variable

Co-authored-by: Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com>
@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Sep 1, 2021

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and then comment @googlebot I fixed it.. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@google-cla google-cla bot added cla: no This human has *not* signed the Contributor License Agreement. and removed cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. labels Sep 1, 2021
@cojenco cojenco added cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. and removed cla: no This human has *not* signed the Contributor License Agreement. labels Sep 1, 2021
@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Sep 1, 2021

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and then comment @googlebot I fixed it.. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@google-cla google-cla bot added cla: no This human has *not* signed the Contributor License Agreement. and removed cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. labels Sep 1, 2021
@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 added cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. and removed cla: no This human has *not* signed the Contributor License Agreement. labels Sep 1, 2021
@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Sep 1, 2021

@gooblebot I consent.

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Sep 1, 2021

@ddelgrosso1 The lint session is failing, likely to do with something in the suggestion you merged. Can you pull from here to your local branch and run nox -s blacken and commit / push the resulting change?

@andrewsg
Copy link
Contributor

andrewsg commented Sep 1, 2021

Denis, please ping me if you would like help running the auto-formatter/linter and writing the regression test.

@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Sep 1, 2021

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and then comment @googlebot I fixed it.. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@google-cla google-cla bot added cla: no This human has *not* signed the Contributor License Agreement. and removed cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. labels Sep 1, 2021
@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Sep 1, 2021

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and then comment @googlebot I fixed it.. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 added cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. and removed cla: no This human has *not* signed the Contributor License Agreement. labels Sep 1, 2021
@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Sep 1, 2021

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.
In order to pass this check, please resolve this problem and then comment @googlebot I fixed it.. If the bot doesn't comment, it means it doesn't think anything has changed.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@google-cla google-cla bot added cla: no This human has *not* signed the Contributor License Agreement. and removed cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. labels Sep 1, 2021
@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 added cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. and removed cla: no This human has *not* signed the Contributor License Agreement. labels Sep 2, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@tseaver tseaver left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ddelgrosso1 Thanks for the test! I verified that it fails against main without the patch.

@tseaver tseaver added the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Sep 2, 2021
@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot merged commit 57cf3a1 into googleapis:main Sep 2, 2021
@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Sep 2, 2021
@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 deleted the user-agent-dupe branch September 2, 2021 17:37
gcf-merge-on-green bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2021
cojenco pushed a commit to cojenco/python-storage that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2021
Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
- [ ] Make sure to open an issue as a [bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/python-storage/issues/new/choose) before writing your code!  That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
- [ ] Ensure the tests and linter pass
- [ ] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
- [ ] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes googleapis#565 🦕
cojenco pushed a commit to cojenco/python-storage that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2021
cojenco pushed a commit to cojenco/python-storage that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2021
Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
- [ ] Make sure to open an issue as a [bug/issue](https://github.com/googleapis/python-storage/issues/new/choose) before writing your code!  That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
- [ ] Ensure the tests and linter pass
- [ ] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
- [ ] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes googleapis#565 🦕
cojenco pushed a commit to cojenco/python-storage that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/python-storage API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use of Batch adds duplicate, redundant gcloud-python/x.xx.x to User-Agent header in an unbounded fashion
5 participants