Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: raise ValueError if date is out-of-bounds #46

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Dec 4, 2021
Merged

Conversation

tswast
Copy link
Collaborator

@tswast tswast commented Dec 3, 2021

Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

  • Make sure to open an issue as a bug/issue before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
  • Ensure the tests and linter pass
  • Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #45 馃

Edit: Maybe should be just "Towards" #45 because I think we still need some way to support out-of-range values so that I can load DATE values when using the conversion logic googleapis/python-bigquery-pandas#441

@tswast tswast requested a review from a team December 3, 2021 21:48
@tswast tswast requested a review from a team as a code owner December 3, 2021 21:48
@tswast tswast requested a review from loferris December 3, 2021 21:48
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Dec 3, 2021
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/python-db-dtypes-pandas API. label Dec 3, 2021
@@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ def types_mapper(
],
type=pyarrow.time64("ns"),
),
id="time-nanoseconds-arrow-round-trip",
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Leftover from debugging why when I made the "time" _datetime method return a Timestamp too, this broke. Since that change isn't necessary and it broke this test I reverted it. Kept the test id, since I thought it was useful.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Test ID is indeed useful IMO. 馃憤

minute=int(minute) if minute else 0,
second=int(second) if second else 0,
nanosecond=nanosecond,
).to_datetime64()
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Towards #19

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably should have been a separate PR, but I noticed _datetime had inconsistent types (sometimes pandas.Timestamp, sometime datetime.datetime, sometime numpy.datetime64). We want a numpy.datetime64 in the end, so I unified it.

@tswast tswast requested a review from plamut December 3, 2021 23:38
Copy link

@plamut plamut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ def types_mapper(
],
type=pyarrow.time64("ns"),
),
id="time-nanoseconds-arrow-round-trip",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Test ID is indeed useful IMO. 馃憤

@tswast tswast merged commit 4253358 into main Dec 4, 2021
@tswast tswast deleted the issue45-extreme-dates branch December 4, 2021 20:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/python-db-dtypes-pandas API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
2 participants