Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: remove ticks from code comments #885

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Jan 15, 2020
Merged

fix: remove ticks from code comments #885

merged 4 commits into from Jan 15, 2020

Conversation

thebrianchen
Copy link

I copied it over from the web github PR, and forgot that code comments are not .md files.

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Jan 15, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 15, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #885 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #885   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    96.6%   96.6%           
======================================
  Files          25      25           
  Lines       15542   15542           
  Branches     1151    1151           
======================================
  Hits        15014   15014           
  Misses        519     519           
  Partials        9       9

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d138179...efa8cc7. Read the comment docs.

@thebrianchen thebrianchen merged commit b2740ed into master Jan 15, 2020
@thebrianchen thebrianchen deleted the bc/remove-ticks branch January 15, 2020 00:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants