fix: Add tests to check fields used in whereIn should not be in implicit orderby

[wu-hui]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1081 into master will decrease coverage by 0.12%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1081      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.62%   97.49%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines       16925    16925              
  Branches     1347     1263      -84     
==========================================
- Hits        16523    16501      -22     
- Misses        399      420      +21     
- Partials        3        4       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
dev/src/order.ts	98.09% <0.00%> (-1.15%)	⬇️
dev/src/pool.ts	97.75% <0.00%> (-0.90%)	⬇️
dev/src/transaction.ts	96.47% <0.00%> (-0.51%)	⬇️
dev/src/watch.ts	98.77% <0.00%> (-0.37%)	⬇️
dev/src/bulk-writer.ts	98.47% <0.00%> (-0.31%)	⬇️
dev/src/document.ts	98.62% <0.00%> (-0.30%)	⬇️
dev/src/validate.ts	98.05% <0.00%> (-0.25%)	⬇️
dev/src/serializer.ts	98.81% <0.00%> (-0.24%)	⬇️
dev/src/write-batch.ts	99.89% <0.00%> (-0.11%)	⬇️
dev/src/reference.ts	99.80% <0.00%> (-0.08%)	⬇️
... and 1 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 40f14d2...432d54d. Read the comment docs.

[thebrianchen]

thanks for adding this!