Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

spanner.it.ITBackupTest: testBackups failed #683

Closed
flaky-bot bot opened this issue Dec 4, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

spanner.it.ITBackupTest: testBackups failed #683

flaky-bot bot opened this issue Dec 4, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/java-spanner API. priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. type: bug Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.

Comments

@flaky-bot
Copy link

flaky-bot bot commented Dec 4, 2020

Note: #542 was also for this test, but it was closed more than 10 days ago. So, I didn't mark it flaky.


commit: d093089
buildURL: Build Status, Sponge
status: failed

Test output
com.google.cloud.spanner.SpannerException: DEADLINE_EXCEEDED: Backup1 still not finished. Test is giving up waiting for it.
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.SpannerExceptionFactory.newSpannerExceptionPreformatted(SpannerExceptionFactory.java:259)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.SpannerExceptionFactory.newSpannerException(SpannerExceptionFactory.java:59)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.SpannerExceptionFactory.newSpannerException(SpannerExceptionFactory.java:54)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.it.ITBackupTest.testBackups(ITBackupTest.java:293)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
	at org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:54)
	at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
	at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
	at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:55)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.createRequestAndRun(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:137)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.executeLazy(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:119)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:87)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:75)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreProvider.invoke(JUnitCoreProvider.java:158)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:377)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:138)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:465)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:451)
@flaky-bot flaky-bot bot added buildcop: issue priority: p1 Important issue which blocks shipping the next release. Will be fixed prior to next release. type: bug Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns. labels Dec 4, 2020
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/java-spanner API. label Dec 4, 2020
@flaky-bot
Copy link
Author

flaky-bot bot commented Dec 6, 2020

Looks like this issue is flaky. 😟

I'm going to leave this open and stop commenting.

A human should fix and close this.


When run at the same commit (d093089), this test passed in one build (Build Status, Sponge) and failed in another build (Build Status, Sponge).

@yoshi-automation yoshi-automation added the 🚨 This issue needs some love. label Dec 11, 2020
@olavloite olavloite added priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. and removed 🚨 This issue needs some love. priority: p1 Important issue which blocks shipping the next release. Will be fixed prior to next release. labels Dec 14, 2020
@olavloite
Copy link
Collaborator

Downgrading priority as it seems that this was a temporary issue (maybe also a side effect of the RESOURCE_EXHAUSTED errors seen in many other test runs).

@skuruppu
Copy link
Contributor

I will close this for now and see if it reopens.

ansh0l pushed a commit to ansh0l/java-spanner that referenced this issue Nov 10, 2022
This is an auto-generated regeneration of the .pb.go files by
cloud.google.com/go/internal/gapicgen. Once this PR is submitted, genbot will
update the corresponding PR to depend on the newer version of go-genproto, and
assign reviewers. Whilst this or any regen PR is open in go-genproto, genbot
will not create any more regeneration PRs. If all regen PRs are closed,
gapicgen will create a new set of regeneration PRs once per night.

If you have been assigned to review this PR, please:

- Ensure that CI is passing. If it's failing, it requires your manual attention.
- Approve and submit this PR if you believe it's ready to ship. That will prompt
genbot to assign reviewers to the google-cloud-go PR.


Corresponding google-cloud-go PR: googleapis/google-cloud-go#4803

Changes:

docs(samples): add auto-generated Node samples build(generator): find protoc based on its bazel location
  PiperOrigin-RevId: 398604509
  Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@6ef16b9

build(accesscontextmanager): add rules to pull in type dependency
  PiperOrigin-RevId: 398601150
  Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@a6b19cb

chore(python): Prepare artifactregistry v1 BUILD.bazel for release
  PiperOrigin-RevId: 398566070
  Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@aa73c56

docs: Provide a more relevant product documentation URL for the Identity Toolkit API
  PiperOrigin-RevId: 398565009
  Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@91bde79

chore(ruby): disable strict yard tests for binaryauthorization/v1
  PiperOrigin-RevId: 398563162
  Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@9367d6f

chore(ruby): Set Ruby GAPIC generator parameters for artifactregistry/v1
  PiperOrigin-RevId: 398539590
  Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@ddf1359

chore(ruby): Set Ruby GAPIC generator parameters for deploy/v1
  PiperOrigin-RevId: 398539523
  Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@f5de29b

chore: use gapic-generator-python 0.51.2
  fix: add 'dict' annotation type to 'request'
  
  Committer: @busunkim96
  PiperOrigin-RevId: 398509016
  Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@b224dfa

chore: regenerate API index
  
  Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@d615c19

feat(bigquery/migration): Add PAUSED state to Subtask and add task details protos
  PiperOrigin-RevId: 398502357
  Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@dfaf37b

fix(asset): depend on the existing access_context_manager and os_config clients rather than copying their classes into the asset client
  PiperOrigin-RevId: 398484365
  Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@e648e5c
rajatbhatta pushed a commit to rajatbhatta/java-spanner that referenced this issue Nov 17, 2022
…uration to v1.2.0 (googleapis#683)

[![WhiteSource Renovate](https://app.renovatebot.com/images/banner.svg)](https://renovatebot.com)

This PR contains the following updates:

| Package | Change | Age | Adoption | Passing | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [com.google.cloud.samples:shared-configuration](https://togithub.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/java-repo-tools) | `1.0.23` -> `1.2.0` | [![age](https://badges.renovateapi.com/packages/maven/com.google.cloud.samples:shared-configuration/1.2.0/age-slim)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [![adoption](https://badges.renovateapi.com/packages/maven/com.google.cloud.samples:shared-configuration/1.2.0/adoption-slim)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [![passing](https://badges.renovateapi.com/packages/maven/com.google.cloud.samples:shared-configuration/1.2.0/compatibility-slim/1.0.23)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [![confidence](https://badges.renovateapi.com/packages/maven/com.google.cloud.samples:shared-configuration/1.2.0/confidence-slim/1.0.23)](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) |

---

### Release Notes

<details>
<summary>GoogleCloudPlatform/java-repo-tools</summary>

### [`v1.2.0`](https://togithub.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/java-repo-tools/compare/v1.0.24...v1.2.0)

[Compare Source](https://togithub.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/java-repo-tools/compare/v1.0.24...v1.2.0)

### [`v1.0.24`](https://togithub.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/java-repo-tools/compare/v1.0.23...v1.0.24)

[Compare Source](https://togithub.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/java-repo-tools/compare/v1.0.23...v1.0.24)

</details>

---

### Configuration

📅 **Schedule**: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

 - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

---

This PR has been generated by [WhiteSource Renovate](https://renovate.whitesourcesoftware.com). View repository job log [here](https://app.renovatebot.com/dashboard#github/googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/java-spanner API. priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. type: bug Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants