Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Allow Optional<T> serialization/deserialization #984

Open
jpJuni0r opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Allow Optional<T> serialization/deserialization #984

jpJuni0r opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
api: firestore Issues related to the googleapis/java-firestore API. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@jpJuni0r
Copy link

jpJuni0r commented Jul 6, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

The firestore serializer/deserializer doesn't support Optional<T> fields.

Describe the solution you'd like

I'd like the firestore serializer/deserializer support reading from Optional<T> and parsing responses to Optional<T> fields.

Describe alternatives you've considered

n/a

Additional context

n/a
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: firestore Issues related to the googleapis/java-firestore API. label Jul 6, 2022
@jpJuni0r jpJuni0r mentioned this issue Jul 6, 2022
Closed
4 tasks
@ehsannas ehsannas added the type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. label Nov 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
api: firestore Issues related to the googleapis/java-firestore API. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

feat(java): add Optional<T> serialization/deserialization jpJuni0r/java-firestore
2 participants
@ehsannas @jpJuni0r