Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MaterializedViewDefinition with partitioning and clustering #1300

Closed
jessicalu2016 opened this issue May 11, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

MaterializedViewDefinition with partitioning and clustering #1300

jessicalu2016 opened this issue May 11, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquery API. type: question Request for information or clarification. Not an issue.

Comments

@jessicalu2016
Copy link

Hi guys,

is there a way to specify partitioning and clustering when creating a Materialized View? MaterializedViewDefinition doesn't seem to provide a way to do it.

Thanks,
Jessica

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquery API. label May 11, 2021
@stephaniewang526 stephaniewang526 self-assigned this May 11, 2021
@yoshi-automation yoshi-automation added the triage me I really want to be triaged. label May 12, 2021
@meredithslota meredithslota added type: question Request for information or clarification. Not an issue. and removed triage me I really want to be triaged. labels May 12, 2021
@stephaniewang526
Copy link
Contributor

stephaniewang526 commented May 16, 2021

Hi, this feature is now supported in v1.130.0. Please try it out and re-open the ticket/open a new ticket if there are other issues.

@jessicalu2016
Copy link
Author

awesome, Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: bigquery Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquery API. type: question Request for information or clarification. Not an issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants