You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
used as the search query in HPMC leads to faster performance.
In my tests so far, it is ~5% faster for a LJ r_cut=2.5 system, but slower for a moderate density hard polyhedra simulation.
Motivation and context
I need to check if higher density hard particle systems can benefit. The ball-AABB check results in hitting ~50% of the AABB nodes (volume of sphere / volume of cube). But, the ball-AABB check is more expensive than AABB-AABB so there are tradeoffs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
Test if this class:
used as the search query in HPMC leads to faster performance.
In my tests so far, it is ~5% faster for a LJ r_cut=2.5 system, but slower for a moderate density hard polyhedra simulation.
Motivation and context
I need to check if higher density hard particle systems can benefit. The ball-AABB check results in hitting ~50% of the AABB nodes (volume of sphere / volume of cube). But, the ball-AABB check is more expensive than AABB-AABB so there are tradeoffs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: