Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relating model parameters #72

Open
rbmetcalf opened this issue Dec 3, 2014 · 4 comments
Open

Relating model parameters #72

rbmetcalf opened this issue Dec 3, 2014 · 4 comments

Comments

@rbmetcalf
Copy link
Member

It would be nice if some parameters can be fixed to others. For example, you might want the lens galaxies to be entered on the lens masses. Or one could imaging relating the mass to the light using some function. This would reduce the effective number of parameters, but might be hard to code.

@fabiobg83
Copy link
Contributor

As I noted in issue #66, there is no such thing as lens mass or lens/source redshift at the moment. The einstein radius only fixes a relation between these quantities.

@rbmetcalf
Copy link
Member Author

I realise this. The Einstein radius is proportional to the velocity dispersion squared and the velocity dispersion is related to the luminosity and size of the galaxy. If all the lens galaxies are assumed to be at the same distance one could find a relation between the luminosity and size of the galaxy and the Einstein radius of the NSIE with a free normalisation that is not dependant on knowing the redshift. One could then interpret the normalisation later with a particular cosmology.

I am more interested in fixing the centres of light to the centres of mass.

@ntessore
Copy link
Member

ntessore commented Dec 3, 2014

I think something similar to what we had in evilense can be implemented with reasonable effort:

[priors]
lens.x = copy central.x

This needs derived parameters #27 to work though, so it's a bit more involved.

@ntessore
Copy link
Member

ntessore commented Oct 8, 2015

Derived parameters are there now with #204, but it's still not easily possible to add a copy prior. The prior system would need access to the full list of parameters for this to work. Copied parameters would also necessarily have to come after the parameters they reference, which could be derived as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants