-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Relating model parameters #72
Comments
As I noted in issue #66, there is no such thing as lens mass or lens/source redshift at the moment. The einstein radius only fixes a relation between these quantities. |
I realise this. The Einstein radius is proportional to the velocity dispersion squared and the velocity dispersion is related to the luminosity and size of the galaxy. If all the lens galaxies are assumed to be at the same distance one could find a relation between the luminosity and size of the galaxy and the Einstein radius of the NSIE with a free normalisation that is not dependant on knowing the redshift. One could then interpret the normalisation later with a particular cosmology. I am more interested in fixing the centres of light to the centres of mass. |
I think something similar to what we had in evilense can be implemented with reasonable effort: [priors]
lens.x = copy central.x This needs derived parameters #27 to work though, so it's a bit more involved. |
Derived parameters are there now with #204, but it's still not easily possible to add a |
It would be nice if some parameters can be fixed to others. For example, you might want the lens galaxies to be entered on the lens masses. Or one could imaging relating the mass to the light using some function. This would reduce the effective number of parameters, but might be hard to code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: