Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reconciling an IP agreement vs. IP provisions in Employment/Contracting contract #78

Open
chris-allan opened this issue Feb 5, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@chris-allan
Copy link

Thanks to everyone for all the previous and ongoing hard work on the documents here!

The README notes:

Many employee IP agreements are very generous – to employers.

and...

If you've worked in the technology space before, there's a good chance that you've run across one or more of these in the past.

Every employee or contractor is going to be signing an employment or contracting contract. These documents almost always contain IP provisions. These documents are referenced in the BEIPA:

The Company owns any IP ("Company IP") that you create, or help create, during the term of your employment or contract work, within the scope of your employment or contract.

Is it the community's and by extension GitHub's experience that employment contracts they are using do not contain any IP provisions? Based on the statements above, are we collectively assuming they are at odds with each other? If not, does the community have experience integrating the terms in the BEIPA into employment contracts (one document seems highly preferrable to two)? If they are expected to be at odds with each other does the community have experience with dispute resolution to share?

@copiesofcopies
Copy link

copiesofcopies commented Feb 5, 2021

@chris-allan in the US, employers will typically provide prospective employees with an offer letter, which is contingent on the employee signing a separate IP assignment agreement (which often also includes confidentiality, non-compete, and non-solicitation terms). In this case, there is no "employment agreement" per se, which is intentional -- it avoids the implication that the employment is anything other than at-will.

@chris-allan
Copy link
Author

Thanks, @copiesofcopies. The BEIPA is the best public representation of the intents we want to convey. As constructed it may just not work well outside the US. We're global so trying to rationalize US, UK, and EU employment law and IP policy into a consistent and cohesive set of language that we can confidently reuse has been quite a challenge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants