Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

windows error: variable dummy being used without being initialized #70

Open
dkouzoup opened this issue Sep 17, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Comments

@dkouzoup
Copy link
Collaborator

The following routine segfaults on windows with the error written on the title:

blasfeo_dtrsm_lunn
(note that the routine blasfeo_dtrsm_lunu is used just before without problems)

blasfeo is compiled with HIGH_PERFORMANCE and GENERIC (REFERENCE works fine)

@dkouzoup
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tmmsartor can you have a look at this please?

@dkouzoup
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@giaf this fix should make his way into acados, is it "safe" to update to latest blasfeo after the fix or you'd rather not yet due to the latest experiments you're working on?

@giaf
Copy link
Owner

giaf commented Sep 18, 2018

This f786b0d should fix (I can't try it out, maybe make the changes locally to check it out)

I don't remember where the acados version stands, but recently a lot of stuff has been changed, and I don't know how much has been through unit tests again. @tmmsartor any idea?

@tmmsartor
Copy link
Contributor

tmmsartor commented Sep 18, 2018

The latest changes are not tested yet.

I would avoid to keep the bleeding edge develop workflow and the stable branch together, at least
until the tests are not fully automatized and thus ready to check every new commit.

I would suggest to track a specific branch or tag of BLASFEO in acados or similar upper level software,
this order to minimize the chances of breaking those software and to be more agile to push eventual hot-fixes.

There are already acados-master or stable branches we can bump up and use these for acados and hpipm.

@dkouzoup
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks for the fix @giaf, but it seems indeed a bit risky to update to the latest blasfeo-master before the latest changes are tested in some way. Ideally, we would keep the "stable" branch a bit more up-to-date or the "master" branch a bit more stable such that bug fixes can be cherry-picked in there. What do you think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants