You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Attached is a benchmark of AxiSEM synthetics against FK synthetics, using the "scak" model from the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. The fits look pretty good!
Getting this result took a lot of debugging. Since AxiSEM is such a useful package for us, if anyone has any advice regarding the following, it'd be really helpful to know.
Thanks,
Ryan
on our system, instaseis was unable to read netcdf files processed using the field_transform.sh script
instaseis successfully read netcdf files processed by the field_transform.py script. However, despite trying a variety block_sizes and cache_sizes, the processing was extremely slow (<< 1 MB/s), which led to processing times of several days for a 2 s dominant period simulation
in short simulations, the AxiSEM solver and mesher ran reliably, but in longer runs or runs with nproc > 4, fatal netcdf runtime errors were a frequent occurrence
when LOCAL_MAX_COLAT in MESHER/inparm_mesh was uncommented, instaseis was unable to read the resulting netcdf output files
to compile AxiSEM in debugging mode on our cluster, we had to add -pthread to the gfortran compiler flags in make_axisem.macros
on our system, instaseis was unable to read netcdf files processed using the field_transform.sh script
This seems to be an inconsistency in libraries (fortran netcdf vs h5netcdf) that has been around for a while now.
instaseis successfully read netcdf files processed by the field_transform.py script. However, despite trying a variety block_sizes and cache_sizes, the processing was extremely slow (<< 1 MB/s), which led to processing times of several days for a 2 s dominant period simulation
in short simulations, the AxiSEM solver and mesher ran reliably, but in longer runs or runs with nproc > 4, fatal netcdf runtime errors were a frequent occurrence
to compile AxiSEM in debugging mode on our cluster, we had to add -pthread to the gfortran compiler flags in make_axisem.macros
This sounds to me like you are not using the parallel netcdf library, but our own round robin parallelization with threads. Maybe try the parallel netcdf instead (USE_PAR_NETCDF = True in make_axisem.macros)
when LOCAL_MAX_COLAT in MESHER/inparm_mesh was uncommented, instaseis was unable to read the resulting netcdf output files
I think I have been using this feature with instaseis before, but it is definitely not well tested. If you can't get around it, I would need a minimal example to reproduce.
Hi all,
Attached is a benchmark of AxiSEM synthetics against FK synthetics, using the "scak" model from the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. The fits look pretty good!
Getting this result took a lot of debugging. Since AxiSEM is such a useful package for us, if anyone has any advice regarding the following, it'd be really helpful to know.
Thanks,
Ryan
on our system, instaseis was unable to read netcdf files processed using the field_transform.sh script
instaseis successfully read netcdf files processed by the field_transform.py script. However, despite trying a variety block_sizes and cache_sizes, the processing was extremely slow (<< 1 MB/s), which led to processing times of several days for a 2 s dominant period simulation
in short simulations, the AxiSEM solver and mesher ran reliably, but in longer runs or runs with nproc > 4, fatal netcdf runtime errors were a frequent occurrence
when LOCAL_MAX_COLAT in MESHER/inparm_mesh was uncommented, instaseis was unable to read the resulting netcdf output files
to compile AxiSEM in debugging mode on our cluster, we had to add -pthread to the gfortran compiler flags in make_axisem.macros
AxiSEM_vs_FK_3s.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: