New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

memory in fieldtransform #37

Open

martinvandriel opened this issue Sep 25, 2015 · 4 comments

Contributor

martinvandriel commented Sep 25, 2015

the optional argument for memory only works the displacement fields, but surface fields can still be much larger.

Contributor

sstaehler commented Sep 28, 2015

do we still need the surface fields for anything?

Contributor Author

martinvandriel commented Sep 28, 2015

I don't think so...

Contributor Author

martinvandriel commented Sep 29, 2015

So, do we want to remove the output or make it optional?

Contributor

sstaehler commented Sep 29, 2015

Remove

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment