Menubar.txt comparaison

[rpo]

#menubar.txt - b779ee5 bad
menubar.txt - ok

Here are two versions of menubar.txt. The first one (#menubar.txt) is from the last update at the master. This version does't show the pop-up preview selections for the Modules (Unions, Parents, Graphs etc. - Windows are empty). I'm runnnig on CGI and ther are lines relatives to cgi that have been deleted in the file - (lines 214-223) - probably not the case but i have'nt look further and others differences are about class fa icons ... Also this is missing : %define;iz(i)%url_set_pz.i;%end; %define;pnocz(pp,nn,oo)%url_set_pz.pp.nn.oo;%end;

Second version (menubar.txt) dated from a few weeks.

[michelmno]

The first one (#menubar.txt) is from the last update at the master. This version does't show the pop-up preview selections for the Modules (Unions, Parents, Graphs etc. - Windows are empty).

I do not have this problem with current geneweb/master branch (cid b779ee5) as per following image
where I tried to use i1 option that correctly has it's preview displayed on the right.

Note the gwd arguments as per Configuration web page (and specifically the images_prefix

[rpo]

Thx
I do not know if it makes a difference but i use cgi mode on linux at distant server ?
In the configuration file i have a static path defined but otherwise not any prefix
Where did you get the gwd for this branch (b779ee5) ?

[michelmno]

what do you mean by a static path defined ?

I am building gwd by myself on my Ubuntu 22.04 linux machine from the related git branch.

as reported in one of the previous screen capture, the gwd has -hd option with /gwtst as subdir accessible by web server. the etc_prefix and images_prefix are generated from that.

[rpo]

what do you mean by a static path defined ?

I am building gwd by myself on my Ubuntu 22.04 linux machine from the related git branch.

as reported in one of the previous screen capture, the gwd has -hd option with /gwtst as subdir accessible by web server. the etc_prefix and images_prefix are generated from that.

I'm using the configuration file base_name.gwf to configure geneweb and there is a static_path parameter --- such as
static_path=genepoulin.net/folder/gw/etc/ to be determined (it also could be named in the CGI script)

So the problem may be cause i'm using gwd from an older commit ? I will wait until the next release.

[michelmno]

static_path from gwf file used in 7.0.0 is obsolete in current main branch as per summary in changes file
https://github.com/geneweb/geneweb/blob/master/CHANGES#L119

[michelmno]

So the problem may be cause i'm using gwd from an older commit ? I will wait until the next release.

You may be interested by my own build of master branch at:
https://github.com/michelmno/geneweb/releases/tag/master_20240405

[rpo]

So the problem may be cause i'm using gwd from an older commit ? I will wait until the next release.

You may be interested by my own build of master branch at: https://github.com/michelmno/geneweb/releases/tag/master_20240405

Your branch (linux) require GLIB libraries my server does not provide (same for any other online mutual server)
I hope the official distribution won't ask for these libraries, because I've just changed the provider for similar reasons. I'm thinking to build the master in a near future :-]

Here the available librairies at the server

[genepoul@web17 gw]$ ldd -v gwd |sort|grep GLIBC
                ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (GLIBC_2.2.5) => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
                ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (GLIBC_2.3) => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
                ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (GLIBC_PRIVATE) => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
                ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (GLIBC_PRIVATE) => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
                ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (GLIBC_PRIVATE) => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
                ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (GLIBC_PRIVATE) => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.10) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.11) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.14) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.14) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.14) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.15) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.16) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.17) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.2.5) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.2.5) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.2.5) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.2.5) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.2.5) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.28) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.3) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.3) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.3.2) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.3.4) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.4) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.4) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.4) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.4) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.4) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.7) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.7) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.9) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_PRIVATE) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_PRIVATE) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libc.so.6 (GLIBC_PRIVATE) => /lib64/libc.so.6
                libdl.so.2 (GLIBC_2.2.5) => /lib64/libdl.so.2
                libm.so.6 (GLIBC_2.2.5) => /lib64/libm.so.6
                libpthread.so.0 (GLIBC_2.2.5) => /lib64/libpthread.so.0

[michelmno]

I did not remember your web server limitation (issue #1272)
I am sorry to have suggested a package that would not have fit it.

• Now, for the "official" distribution, the geneweb workflow files are not able
  to use anymore the ubuntu-18.04 since April 2023 as per blog https://github.blog/changelog/2022-08-09-github-actions-the-ubuntu-18-04-actions-runner-image-is-being-deprecated-and-will-be-removed-by-12-1-22/
• Your need is not an "official" distribution, but you will need somebody to build and deliver an home made build with a local Ubuntu 18.04 (or a CentOS)

[rpo]

OK. If it's a limitation, it's one that all shared Linux servers have in Quebec. Since #1272 i have move the application to a different provider, one that is supposed to be up to date concerning those librairies (3x price). I hope to compile the distribution soon. Thanks.  -------- Message d'origine --------De : Michel Normand ***@***.***> Date : 2024-04-08 08 h 21 (GMT-05:00) À : geneweb/geneweb ***@***.***> Cc : Volvox ***@***.***>, Author ***@***.***> Objet : Re: [geneweb/geneweb] Menubar.txt comparaison (Issue #1758) I did not remember your web server limitation (issue #1272) I am sorry to have suggested a package that would not have fit it. Now, for the "official" distribution, the geneweb workflow files are not able to use anymore the ubuntu-18.04 since April 2023 as per blog https://github.blog/changelog/2022-08-09-github-actions-the-ubuntu-18-04-actions-runner-image-is-being-deprecated-and-will-be-removed-by-12-1-22/ Your need is not an "official" distribution, but you will need somebody to build and deliver an home made build with a local Ubuntu 18.04 (or a CentOS) —Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>