Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE REQUEST] Need to better display two unions of same couple #1688

Open
michelmno opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@michelmno
Copy link
Contributor

Need to better display two unions of same couple

Use Case 1 (as per attached fadinautres.gw input file)

  • The same couple Alexandre Lombard & Jeanne Fadin has two marriages
    ** one on 21 May 1884
    ** one on 24 December 1907
    ** with a divorce between them on 30 October 1890

  • The three events are correctly reported in Timeline part

  • But the first marriage IS NOT reported in Marriage part

  • The divorce is placed AFTER the last marriage, while should be placed before

  • The source of the first marriage IS NOT reported in Source part

Capture d’écran du 2024-01-02 16-55-49
Capture d’écran du 2024-01-02 16-54-46
fadinautres.zip

Use Case 2
If I am using the Add Family to create the second marriage then following warning is reported

Warnings
    Alexandre Lombard and Jeanne Fadin have several unions

even if two marriages and divorce are correctly reported in Marriage and Source parts
Capture d’écran du 2024-01-02 17-33-39
Capture d’écran du 2024-01-02 17-34-09
fadinautre2.zip

The Use Case 2 seems to be the simplest one to solve.

@a2line
Copy link
Collaborator

a2line commented Jan 22, 2024

The use case 2 is the good one. The first one is to forget: if the second wedding correctly prints, it's not a good way to treat this rare case because a lot of tools will fail finding the second wedding in the same family. It could be lot of work to support case 1 well. And for the warning, it warns for a possible error: it looks good as it is and we should keep it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants