You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Use Case 1 (as per attached fadinautres.gw input file)
The same couple Alexandre Lombard & Jeanne Fadin has two marriages
** one on 21 May 1884
** one on 24 December 1907
** with a divorce between them on 30 October 1890
The three events are correctly reported in Timeline part
But the first marriage IS NOT reported in Marriage part
The divorce is placed AFTER the last marriage, while should be placed before
The source of the first marriage IS NOT reported in Source part
The use case 2 is the good one. The first one is to forget: if the second wedding correctly prints, it's not a good way to treat this rare case because a lot of tools will fail finding the second wedding in the same family. It could be lot of work to support case 1 well. And for the warning, it warns for a possible error: it looks good as it is and we should keep it.
Need to better display two unions of same couple
Use Case 1 (as per attached fadinautres.gw input file)
The same couple Alexandre Lombard & Jeanne Fadin has two marriages
** one on 21 May 1884
** one on 24 December 1907
** with a divorce between them on 30 October 1890
The three events are correctly reported in Timeline part
But the first marriage IS NOT reported in Marriage part
The divorce is placed AFTER the last marriage, while should be placed before
The source of the first marriage IS NOT reported in Source part
fadinautres.zip
Use Case 2
If I am using the
Add Family
to create the second marriage then following warning is reportedeven if two marriages and divorce are correctly reported in Marriage and Source parts
fadinautre2.zip
The Use Case 2 seems to be the simplest one to solve.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: